h.e.s.e. project

the international scientific Internet platform on topical issues
in affiliation with the Kompetenz initiative

h.e.s.e.-UK comment

If you read our ‘thought experiment’ you will realise just how much is at stake in discovering any interaction between modern digital microwave communications and living things. Do we, as economically-driven societies want to know? The similarity with human-influenced climate change is close: what is the cost of inaction, against cost of taking action? Are we simply hiding from the long-term issue? And yet, consider this:

Matter is the entanglement of energy; everything is oscillations in the electromagnetic field. Electromagnetics is not the physics of what is going on between particles, it is the essence of all particles too. Prof. Konstantin Meyl and Dr Grahame Blackwell might express this in terms of ‘everything is light’.

This being the case, choosing to communicate so prolifically by filling the spectrum with not even smooth oscillations, but sharp-rise waveforms with rigid patterns and frequencies might seem a bit careless. As an analogy, imagine a race of ice creatures starting to throw water around.

How much do we really know?

• So we know that electromagnetic fields do not have a resonant response with ions and molecules?
• So we know that potential, or scalar, waves do not exist, only transverse waves?
• So we know our cell membranes are unresponsive to electromagnetic influences?
• So we know that our genetic material is unresponsive to frequencies of any kind?
• So we know there is no quantum mechanism at work in enzymes?
• So we know there are no quantum interactions resulting from flooding our environment with digitally structured microwaves?
• So we know that living organisms are so separate from electromagnetic reality that there can be no harm done?

We can say a resounding NO to each of these statements. We do know the opposite. That being the case, the ice creatures had better beware. Without stretching the analogy too far, it isn’t the wetness of the water; it isn’t the weight or volume; it isn’t how superficial each drop appears to be; it is the number of drops landing incessantly on us.

The stakes

This is not a battle to have with the communications industry. This is an issue of understanding some of the facts, sharing the problem, and coming up with an action plan. But the one thing we cannot afford to do is to pretend that we are somehow so separate from our environment that we cannot be affected by monumental changes we are making to it.

We are shaking the very fabric of reality in order to communicate wirelessly.

It is therefore not constructive to find that those like ourselves engaged with h.e.s.e.-UK, who simply want to create a better shared understanding of reality and protect our well-being, are deliberately undermined by those with the power or money to continue the exponential proliferation of modern communications. It is ironic that we do not use mobile phones, DECT, WiFi etc., and yet our non-wireless means of communications are still intercepted, disrupted or deliberately cut in order to stop our ‘conversations with the truth’.

top of page